What voters want

Open discussion about the world we live in today. Topics in here can get heated, but please keep it civil.

Moderator: Priests of Syrinx

User avatar
ElfDude
Posts: 11085
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 1:19 pm
Location: In the shadows of the everlasting hills
Contact:

What voters want

Post by ElfDude »

A few quotes from Hillary Clinton.

The first is from January 1992 on 60 minutes, talking about what voters want.
Part of what I believe with all my heart is that the voters are tired of people who lie to them. They're tired of people who act like something they're not. They're tired of people who deny problems. They're tired of people who neglect problems.
And now, just recently:
We do the very best job we can based on the information available to us to make appropriate vetting decisions, and this one, uhh, was a big surprise to everybody.
If that sounds familiar, it's similar to the line she used during her 2000 campaign when asked about her brother who was selling pardons...
You know, it came as a surprise, uhh, to me, and it was very disturbing, and I'm just, uh, very disappointed about it. I did, uh, not, uh, have any involvement, you know, and, uh, I'm just very, uh, disappointed about my brother's involvement. If I had known about, uh, this, we wouldn't be standing here today. Uhhh, I didn't know about it, and I'm very...regretful that, uh, it occurred, that I didn't know about it. Uh, I might have been able to prevent this from happening. And I'm just very disappointed about the whole matter. I did not know. I was heartbroken and -- and shocked by it.
A big surprise and she didn't know anything. Just like Hsu was a big surprise and she didn't know anything. Kinda like in 1994 when her brothers were involved in the Marc Rich pardons and the billing records that had her name on them.
The young attorney, the young bank officer did all the work, and the letter was sent, but because I was what you call "the billing attorney" -- in other words, I had to send the bill to get the payment made -- my name was put on the bottom of the letter. It was not an area that I practiced in. It was not an area that I really know anything, to speak of, about.
In that same press conference she was asked about what documents were removed from Vince Foster's office after he died and why they were there in the first place...
I -- I can tell you what I know which is that I did not know that Vince had any of the documents related to our personal business in his office until after his death.
And of course, there was her big surprise in 1998. From the Today Show:
HILLARY: Answer my husband. I mean, you know, he woke me up Wednesday morning and said, "You're not going to believe this, but..." and I said, "What is this?" And so, yeah, it came as a very big surprise.

LAUER: He said, "But"? He said "but" what?

HILLARY: "But...I want to tell you what's in the newspapers."
So... everything is a big surprise and she never knows anything. And voters are "tired of people who act like something they're not. They're tired of people who deny problems. They're tired of people who neglect problems." Well, yeah, we are.

So... why are we supposed to vote for her again? :lol:
Aren't you the guy who hit me in the eye?
Image
User avatar
awip2062
Posts: 25518
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:15 am
Contact:

Post by awip2062 »

Because she wants us to vote for her?

Because the other option is (insert whatever denigration you like best here)?
Onward and Upward!
zepboy
Posts: 6760
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:42 am
Location: Lookin for a place.
Contact:

Post by zepboy »

I think that if Hillary is the best the DNC has to offer, that is a very sad commentary about the state of credibility in politics. For those of you whose draw party lines and are offended by this, I must also put out there that the Republican Party isn't doing a whole lot better.


*stares into the politico abbyss looking for a possible answer to a garguan delimma*
CygnusX1
Posts: 17306
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: We don't call 911 here.

Post by CygnusX1 »

The whole thing disgusts me, but if you don't vote, you can't say squat about the outcome.

A catch-22 if there ever was one.

**still waiting for a third party to go large**
Don't start none...won't be none.
User avatar
awip2062
Posts: 25518
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:15 am
Contact:

Post by awip2062 »

CygnusX1 wrote:
**still waiting for a third party to go large**
SO with ya!
Onward and Upward!
User avatar
Mr. Potatoe Head
Posts: 1783
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 6:25 am

Re: What voters want

Post by Mr. Potatoe Head »

ElfDude wrote:A few quotes from Hillary Clinton.

The first is from January 1992 on 60 minutes, talking about what voters want.
Part of what I believe with all my heart is that the voters are tired of people who lie to them. They're tired of people who act like something they're not. They're tired of people who deny problems. They're tired of people who neglect problems.
And now, just recently:
We do the very best job we can based on the information available to us to make appropriate vetting decisions, and this one, uhh, was a big surprise to everybody.
If that sounds familiar, it's similar to the line she used during her 2000 campaign when asked about her brother who was selling pardons...
You know, it came as a surprise, uhh, to me, and it was very disturbing, and I'm just, uh, very disappointed about it. I did, uh, not, uh, have any involvement, you know, and, uh, I'm just very, uh, disappointed about my brother's involvement. If I had known about, uh, this, we wouldn't be standing here today. Uhhh, I didn't know about it, and I'm very...regretful that, uh, it occurred, that I didn't know about it. Uh, I might have been able to prevent this from happening. And I'm just very disappointed about the whole matter. I did not know. I was heartbroken and -- and shocked by it.
A big surprise and she didn't know anything. Just like Hsu was a big surprise and she didn't know anything. Kinda like in 1994 when her brothers were involved in the Marc Rich pardons and the billing records that had her name on them.
The young attorney, the young bank officer did all the work, and the letter was sent, but because I was what you call "the billing attorney" -- in other words, I had to send the bill to get the payment made -- my name was put on the bottom of the letter. It was not an area that I practiced in. It was not an area that I really know anything, to speak of, about.
In that same press conference she was asked about what documents were removed from Vince Foster's office after he died and why they were there in the first place...
I -- I can tell you what I know which is that I did not know that Vince had any of the documents related to our personal business in his office until after his death.
And of course, there was her big surprise in 1998. From the Today Show:
HILLARY: Answer my husband. I mean, you know, he woke me up Wednesday morning and said, "You're not going to believe this, but..." and I said, "What is this?" And so, yeah, it came as a very big surprise.

LAUER: He said, "But"? He said "but" what?

HILLARY: "But...I want to tell you what's in the newspapers."
So... everything is a big surprise and she never knows anything. And voters are "tired of people who act like something they're not. They're tired of people who deny problems. They're tired of people who neglect problems." Well, yeah, we are.

So... why are we supposed to vote for her again? :lol:
uh, uhh, uhhh... I'll get back to you on that one, I got to pull people's head out of the sand first... but uh, I think I'll, uhhh wait till after I, uh take a nap, uhhhhhh
User avatar
Wendy
Posts: 1557
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Astral Plane of Happiness

Post by Wendy »

Democrats Talk Iraq in Univision Debate
By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

4 hours ago

CORAL GABLES, Fla. - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton insisted Sunday night it's time to start pulling U.S. troops out of Iraq as she and her Democratic presidential rivals debated the war on the eve of a much-awaited assessment by U.S. commanding Gen. David Petraeus.

In the first presidential debate ever broadcast in Spanish, the protracted war in Iraq competed for attention with the swirling argument over immigration. On Iraq, Gov. Bill Richardson retorted that Clinton and others who want to leave residual forces there would leave soldiers at risk.

"I'd bring them all home within six to eight months," the New Mexico governor said in the debate, which was broadcast on Univision, the nation's largest Spanish-language network. "There is a basic difference between all of us here ... This is a fundamental issue," he said.

Clinton said that a report being presented in Washington by Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker this week won't change the basic problem that there is no military solution in Iraq. "I believe we should start bringing our troops home," she said. "We need to quit refereeing their civil war and bring our troops home as soon as possible."

All who were asked about immigration at the debate on the campus of the University of Miami said they would address this vexing issue in their first year in office.

Clinton criticized the immigration bill proposed in the last Congress, dominated by Republicans. That legislation would have penalized those who help illegal immigrants. "I said it would have criminalized the good Samaritan. It would have criminalized Jesus Christ," she said.

That the Democrats participated in the Spanish-language debate is the clearest sign yet of the growing influence of Hispanic voters. The candidates are reaching out to Hispanics with an intensity that speaks to the importance of the nation's largest and fastest-growing minority group in the campaign.

Anchors Jorge Ramos and Maria Elena Salinas posed questions in Spanish and the candidates had earpieces to hear simultaneous translations into English. The candidates' responses were simultaneously translated into Spanish for broadcast, and English-speaking viewers could watch using the closed caption service on their televisions.

Not surprisingly for anchors who vocally support a path to legalization for the nation's estimated 12 million immigrants, both Ramos and Salinas framed their questions with the basic assumption that immigrants, including those in the country illegally, face discrimination and have been unfairly demonized _ a view not universally shared in the English-language media.

Univision's late entry to the field of networks hosting such high-profile political events was evident Sunday night. Reporters from around the world who came to Florida to cover the debate were left with no audio feed in the room where they were placed outside the debate hall for the first 35 minutes of the 90-minute event.

Richardson, one of two candidate who speak fluent Spanish, objected to the debate rules that required all candidates to answer in English. The rule was designed to make sure that no candidate had an advantage in appealing to the Spanish-speaking audience.

"I'm disappointed today that 43 million Latinos in this country, for them not to hear one of their own speak Spanish, is unfortunate," said Richardson, the governor of New Mexico. "In other words, Univision is promoting English-only in this debate."

Dodd, who served in the Peace Corps in the Dominican Republic, also speaks Spanish fluently. He called for more U.S. engagement with Latin America, including a lifting of trade embargo against Cuba.

"We're allowing a Hugo Chavez to win a public relations effort in Latin America because we don't invest enough in Latin America," he said.

Former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel boasted that he's also bilingual _ in French. "I honor everyone who comes to this country as an immigrant because we are all immigrants."

Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich said he would make Spanish a second national language, but no leading candidate was willing to go that far.

The candidates were asked why they supported a wall along the Mexican border _ and not a similar fence along the U.S.-Canadian border _ a question that seemed to catch them somewhat off-guard. Most avoided answering directly, saying simply that they believed security was a key part of comprehensive immigration reform.

"I do favor more security on the border and in some cases a physical border because that has to be part of securing our borders," Clinton said.

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama spoke of his father's experience as an immigrant and noted that he supported the comprehensive immigration bill that passed the U.S. Senate last year.

Richardson, who has opposed the wall, said he would commit to comprehensive reform in the first year.

"If you're going to build a 12 foot wall. You know what's going to happen? A lot of 13-foot ladders."

But there are strong feelings against the Iraq war among Hispanics, so that topic lead the debate, with the moderators noting that two-thirds of Hispanics support a withdrawal from Iraq. Kucinich was loudly applauded for saying he would pull troops out.

Obama aligned himself with Kucinich.

"I was a strong opponent of the war, as Dennis was," Obama said, adding that President Bush is trying to make it appear that the 35,000 troop surge earlier this year has had an impact.

Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards said he's concerned the Petraeus report "will basically be a sales job by the White House."

Delaware Sen. Joe Biden, recently returned from a trip to Iraq, skipped the debate to prepare for a Foreign Relations Committee hearing that he is scheduled to chair Tuesday on the Petraeus report.

Univision invited the Republican candidates for a similar forum, but only Arizona Sen. John McCain has accepted.

Hispanics have a new voice in the Democratic primary process with Nevada holding an early contest. Florida also has moved up its primary to Jan. 29, violating party rules. Democratic candidates have pledged to stop campaigning in Florida unless the date is changed by the end of the month.

In 2004, President Bush won about 40 percent of the Hispanic vote nationally, the most ever for a GOP presidential candidate. His Democratic rival, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, won 53 percent, down from the 62 percent former Vice President Al Gore garnered in 2000.

Throughout the debate, Richardson stressed that Hispanic's main concerns are the same as most Americans: the war in Iraq, health care, education and housing.

"We're part of the American mainstream," he said. "We shouldn't be put in a box."

oNe LiTtLe vIcToRy
SEMI OFFICIAL BILINGUALISM ENTERS AMERICA :) :? :shock: :x - Which one r u?
Sound verbalized tones touch textured feel scent wafted aroma see visualize observe sing dance live
User avatar
Mr. Potatoe Head
Posts: 1783
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 6:25 am

Post by Mr. Potatoe Head »

influenced by something that was written in 1984

Uncle George wants you to forget about failing home loans, falling bridges, racism, poverty, health care, education, devastating storms, violence and have a good war.


I am not voting as of yet there isn't one and doubt there will be one that lives up to my expectations.
User avatar
Wendy
Posts: 1557
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Astral Plane of Happiness

Post by Wendy »

Actually, I was curious about opinions on bilingualism in America.
Sound verbalized tones touch textured feel scent wafted aroma see visualize observe sing dance live
User avatar
awip2062
Posts: 25518
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:15 am
Contact:

Post by awip2062 »

I have no trouble with bilingual people living here or passing that on to their children. We have a couple who live near us who are (leagllay) from Poland and they speak Polish in their home. When their children are here and call home, they will speak in Polish to their parents on the other end.

BUT

They and their children speak English at work and school and with us. They don't ask that their employers learn Polish, that their children's teachers learn Polish or their children be taught in Polish, or that I learn their language.

I believe that we need one language that we all use with each other. This doesn't mean we can't continue with our mother tongues, but it will mean we can all understand each other and discuss with each other.
Onward and Upward!
User avatar
Walkinghairball
Posts: 25037
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:42 pm
Location: In a rock an roll venue near you....as long as you are in the Pacific Northwest.

Post by Walkinghairball »

Exactamundo....................... there, Hairball is Bilingual.
This space for rent
User avatar
awip2062
Posts: 25518
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:15 am
Contact:

Post by awip2062 »

*high fives*
Onward and Upward!
User avatar
Wendy
Posts: 1557
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Astral Plane of Happiness

Post by Wendy »

Ah, the human languages, composed of so many beautiful notes like music.
Sound verbalized tones touch textured feel scent wafted aroma see visualize observe sing dance live
User avatar
Big Blue Owl
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Somewhere between the darkness and the light

Post by Big Blue Owl »

Clinton criticized the immigration bill proposed in the last Congress, dominated by Republicans. That legislation would have penalized those who help illegal immigrants. "I said it would have criminalized the good Samaritan. It would have criminalized Jesus Christ," she said.
Ok, I had high hopes for her, but now I'm thinkin' someone has to take her out. Where is Jeff Gilhooly when you need him? Eh, just kidding, but geez, what an assmunch.
(((((((((((((((all'a you)))))))))))))))
CygnusX1
Posts: 17306
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: We don't call 911 here.

Post by CygnusX1 »

Wendy wrote:Actually, I was curious about opinions on bilingualism in America.
it just got to us here, as I saw the first Home Depot store doors with
hours posted in English and Spanish.

Funny...now I know they won't make English the official language.

they'd have to repaint all those doors! :P

Ah, but you've only seen the beginning....

Next they'll want French, German, Russian, Asian and Middle Eastern languages on 'em too...

but hey, I could be wrong. :roll: :-D
Don't start none...won't be none.
Post Reply