FOOTBALL 2010 season picks
Moderator: Priests of Syrinx
Sure, Chicago didn't "show up" at home for Seattle, but who cares?
That was week 6. In fact, they laid down for the Redskins the next week,
and here's a bonus - N.O. choked against the BROWNS the same
week.
Who cared then? Even the Saints dropped a couple (well, 5 to be
exact) this year. Both N.O. and Chicago are 11-5.
Chicago beat FIVE post-season teams from last year. They lost to two
(GB and NE). They SHUT OUT Miami, SWEPT Minnesota and split
with GB.
The only thing against the Bears this year is that they're better
on the road.
Don't EVEN count them out. They're my "spoiler" pick for 2010.
That was week 6. In fact, they laid down for the Redskins the next week,
and here's a bonus - N.O. choked against the BROWNS the same
week.
Who cared then? Even the Saints dropped a couple (well, 5 to be
exact) this year. Both N.O. and Chicago are 11-5.
Chicago beat FIVE post-season teams from last year. They lost to two
(GB and NE). They SHUT OUT Miami, SWEPT Minnesota and split
with GB.
The only thing against the Bears this year is that they're better
on the road.
Don't EVEN count them out. They're my "spoiler" pick for 2010.
Don't start none...won't be none.
CygnusX1 wrote:Sure, Chicago didn't "show up" at home for Seattle, but who cares?
That was week 6. In fact, they laid down for the Redskins the next week,
and here's a bonus - N.O. choked against the BROWNS the same
week.
Who cared then? Even the Saints dropped a couple (well, 5 to be
exact) this year. Both N.O. and Chicago are 11-5.
Chicago beat FIVE post-season teams from last year. They lost to two
(GB and NE). They SHUT OUT Miami, SWEPT Minnesota and split
with GB.
The only thing against the Bears this year is that they're better
on the road.
Don't EVEN count them out. They're my "spoiler" pick for 2010.
The Bears suck.. Cutler is going to fall apart like he always does..
Happy 2015!
Let's see... N'awlins barely beat the 49ers in week 2....Soup4Rush wrote:The Saints were favored by 10 as well!
lost to CAROLINA in week 4....
got CLOBBERED by Cleveland....
...but spanked Seattle's ass in week 11. hmmm....
At least the Seagulls showed up for the game that counted.
Call me crazy, but I think Chicago will be ready for this one.
Don't start none...won't be none.
That's true, but Chicago will have had 2 weeks to watch and prepare.Soup4Rush wrote:its all about the team that gets hot in the playoffs.. Seattle is hot and motivated right now and they have nothing to lose.. a very dangerous combination..
Personally, I hope it's a defensive slobberknocker.
Don't start none...won't be none.
If Cutler keeps the offense moving and the secondary shuts down
Hasselbeck's passing game, it's on.
Seattle will most likely not run the ball effectively and ditch the run game
quickly. Remember - THEY are the underdogs here.
To me, it's all up to the pass defenses on both teams. We'll see.
Hasselbeck's passing game, it's on.
Seattle will most likely not run the ball effectively and ditch the run game
quickly. Remember - THEY are the underdogs here.
To me, it's all up to the pass defenses on both teams. We'll see.
Don't start none...won't be none.
- Middle Kingdom
- Posts: 3361
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 7:44 am
- Location: Bacchus Plateau
- Orlando's LOVESLAVE
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 8:32 pm
- Location: Confused state of mind.
- Walkinghairball
- Posts: 25037
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:42 pm
- Location: In a rock an roll venue near you....as long as you are in the Pacific Northwest.