By-Tor.com

Of these, 20 prohibit criminals and their families from suing people who injure or kill criminals in self-defense.

That still kills me that some POS lawyer somewhere actually used a defence like that and won. The judge should have been disbarred for allowing that.

Like when some scrotesack thug invades my home or comes after my family, that he actually has ANY rights at that point is beyond belief.

Oh well.....................................let's party!!!!!!!!

Walkinghairball wrote:

Of these, 20 prohibit criminals and their families from suing people who injure or kill criminals in self-defense.

That still kills me that some POS lawyer somewhere actually used a defence like that and won. The judge should have been disbarred for allowing that.

Like when some scrotesack thug invades my home or comes after my family, that he actually has ANY rights at that point is beyond belief.

Oh well.....................................let's party!!!!!!!!

Agreed Bro. That's why we need to check our states' Castle laws, or lack
thereof.

In my state, I have to be at risk of loss of life or limb before I bring the
pain, even if the bastard's in my house.

That rule is great for a drunk roommate trying to get in at 4 in the
morning, but that's about it.

"It was the craziest thing. This guy broke my window, climbed inside, filled a bag with lots of my stuff, then beat himself to death with it!"

^^^^^^^^


That's my story!!!!!!!!!!


"Honest officer, he just looked really cold so I covered him up with my car."