Page 3 of 3
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:24 pm
by Walkinghairball
Soup4Rush wrote:how bout that??? Hairball comes in here and rips off a good one..
well played sir!
Well I had something else to say, but I will do that in PM. I don't feel like being an ass today.
What, just today..........
............I knew it was gonna come out from one of ya, might as well be me.
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:27 pm
by Soup4Rush
that never stopped me!
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:27 pm
by CygnusX1
Soup4Rush wrote:how bout that??? Hairball comes in here and rips off a good one..
well played sir!
True dat.
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:37 pm
by Walkinghairball
Soup4Rush wrote:that never stopped me!
Even if it is directed to just you?
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:38 pm
by Soup4Rush
especially that
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:44 pm
by Walkinghairball
Soup4Rush wrote:especially that
So, do you want the public version, or PM?
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:55 pm
by ElfDude
Walkinghairball wrote:Soup4Rush wrote:straighten up Sigs... Hairball is in the house..
Heh.
Don't you think yer being a little hardon Palin bro???
Speaking of Perot, he didn't know jack on policy, but he would have made America more rich than anyone ever. And most likely with no scandal.
I dunno... he was saying we could deal with the deficit by tripling gasoline taxes, stuff like that. Tax increases have never lead to prosperity. I agree about the no scandal part though.
But that stuff aside, his presence in the races split the conservative vote. Bill Clinton never had a true majority. He was winning with about 40 percent or something like that. If memory serves me something similar happened in Germany when Hitler won with about 33% of the vote.
Before all the sex talk in the thread began someone was talking about a purging of incumbants in 2010. I sure hope that's true.
Anyway, no idea what Palin is up to, but I sure hope it isn't the third party thing.
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:09 pm
by CygnusX1
ElfDude wrote: Before all the sex talk in the thread began someone was talking about a purging of incumbants in 2010. I sure hope that's true.
That would be yours truly, until I was coerced into Sarah-Lust.
***slaps Soup one up high***
Incumbents are roadkill next year, and the ones backing
O - or not - know it.
Personally, I have a new respect for
Blue Dog Dems. They are
even feeling the tire marks of the Chicago machine.
Still, they're done in 2010 as well if they keep going with the flow, and
people are watchin.'
Someone has got to buck this system so we can take our country back.
And BTW - it's
O's economy now. I really wish
he would give the "inherited mess" angle up. It's so weak, and no one
buys it anymore.
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:11 pm
by Soup4Rush
CygnusX1 wrote:ElfDude wrote: Before all the sex talk in the thread began someone was talking about a purging of incumbants in 2010. I sure hope that's true.
That would be yours truly, until I was coerced into Sarah-Lust.
***slaps Soup one up high***
Incumbents are roadkill next year, and the ones backing
O - or not - know it.
Personally, I have a new respect for
Blue Dog Dems. They are
even feeling the tire marks of the Chicago machine.
Still, they're done in 2010 if they keep going with the flow, and people are
watchin.'
Someone has got to buck this system so we can take our country back.
was he talking about us?
Sorry, my mind wanders..
*high fives my partner in crime*