Today's Headlines

Open discussion about the world we live in today. Topics in here can get heated, but please keep it civil.

Moderator: Priests of Syrinx

User avatar
Big Blue Owl
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Somewhere between the darkness and the light

Post by Big Blue Owl »

You gave us two links to the same story...


The second link is a courtesy to our Cygman who cannot view Youtube. :-)
(((((((((((((((all'a you)))))))))))))))
User avatar
Walkinghairball
Posts: 25037
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:42 pm
Location: In a rock an roll venue near you....as long as you are in the Pacific Northwest.

Post by Walkinghairball »

Big Blue Owl wrote:
You gave us two links to the same story...


The second link is a courtesy to our Cygman who cannot view Youtube. :-)

Yeah,............ so there. :razz:
This space for rent
User avatar
Big Blue Owl
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Somewhere between the darkness and the light

Post by Big Blue Owl »

Image

Sarah Smiles is not aware of the delicious breakfast treat on her head.
(((((((((((((((all'a you)))))))))))))))
CygnusX1
Posts: 17306
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: We don't call 911 here.

Post by CygnusX1 »

Big Blue Owl wrote:
You gave us two links to the same story...


The second link is a courtesy to our Cygman who cannot view Youtube. :-)
Thanks Owlie, but we can't watch Fox vids either.
I watched it on TV at home. For the LAST TWO DAYS! LOL

If it's what I'm thinking it is, it's the Cameron story about the McCain
insider-that-shall-remain-nameless (coward) that ran his/her mouth about
Palin.

Somehow that qualifies as news, but I'm just not getting it.

It can't be proven or even questioned. Fox reported it, but keep in
mind that nobody can prove shit until the spineless cockroach that
said it appears in the media to back it up, but don't hold your breath for
that to happen.

It's over. Why can't people just let a dead dog lie?

Or, at the LEAST, get Palin on Fox to set the record straight...

Would that be acceptable to all the haters?
Don't start none...won't be none.
User avatar
Big Blue Owl
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Somewhere between the darkness and the light

Post by Big Blue Owl »

You'll have to ask a hater.

It seems to be simply illustrating what people without blinders and drunk goggles have been saying all along, but have been called things like hater and stuff when they express their astonishment that someone of such poor world-knowledge could possibly be the leader of the free world. She'd have her own military, nuclear weapons and even the keys to Fort Knox (I feel a shopping spree coming on!), and the fact that it was all true and much, much more (couldn't be reported until declassified), AND reported by Papa Bear and Fox. This seems to lend some credence to these outrageous stories, but I see now that it doesn't matter. She's a hot woman and that is all that one needs to have many millions of people look the other way when it comes to shortcomings. I mean, look at Obama. Same thing, IMO, but much more intelligent and serious about it all.
Last edited by Big Blue Owl on Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
(((((((((((((((all'a you)))))))))))))))
CygnusX1
Posts: 17306
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: We don't call 911 here.

Post by CygnusX1 »

Big Blue Owl wrote:You'll have to ask a hater.
Roger that Bro. Still think Fox is biased? LMAO
Don't start none...won't be none.
User avatar
Big Blue Owl
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Somewhere between the darkness and the light

Post by Big Blue Owl »

I added stuff since you posted, sorry. Fox will be as right-biased as MSNBC is for the left until the end of time. It's just that now they see that ratings can still be high if they keep these ridiculous stories in the forefront.
(((((((((((((((all'a you)))))))))))))))
CygnusX1
Posts: 17306
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: We don't call 911 here.

Post by CygnusX1 »

Big Blue Owl wrote:I added stuff since you posted, sorry. Fox will be as right-biased as MSNBC is for the left until the end of time. It's just that now they see that ratings can still be high if they keep these ridiculous stories in the forefront.
hahahaha I'll make a deal with ya Owlie.....

Watch O'Reilly ONE NIGHT...if he DOESN'T have a democrat or liberal on
as a guest just like a conservative...which he does EVERY NIGHT...

I'll post a pic of me...picking my nose down to the second knuckle.
Don't start none...won't be none.
User avatar
Big Blue Owl
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Somewhere between the darkness and the light

Post by Big Blue Owl »

Hahaha! I have no doubt that he will have a lefty on, but it's trying to get him to not yell at them that is the problem.

Oreilly: "Thanks for coming on the show. What are your feelings about the outcome of the race?

Lefty LaDick: "Well, I am..."

Oreilly: "TYPICAL! YOU COME IN HERE WITH YOUR STUPID OPINIONS AND CONJECTURE, YOUR GOTCHA JOURNALISM AND KATIE COURIC MOUTH! GET OUT! GET OUT! FUCK! FUCK! WHAT AM I RUNNING HERE, A LIBERAL KINDERGARTEN? WHO BOOKED THIS IDIOT? SAM? YOU'RE FIRED, MORON!"

:lol:
(((((((((((((((all'a you)))))))))))))))
CygnusX1
Posts: 17306
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: We don't call 911 here.

Post by CygnusX1 »

Big Blue Owl wrote:Hahaha! I have no doubt that he will have a lefty on, but it's trying to get him to not yell at them that is the problem.

Oreilly: "Thanks for coming on the show. What are your feelings about the outcome of the race?

Lefty LaDick: "Well, I am..."

Oreilly: "TYPICAL! YOU COME IN HERE WITH YOUR STUPID OPINIONS AND CONJECTURE, YOUR GOTCHA JOURNALISM AND KATIE COURIC MOUTH! GET OUT! GET OUT! FUCK! FUCK! WHAT AM I RUNNING HERE, A LIBERAL KINDERGARTEN? WHO BOOKED THIS IDIOT? SAM? YOU'RE FIRED, MORON!"

:lol:
"WE'LL DO IT LIVE!" **throws his mic down**

"F*CK IT! WE'LL DO IT LIVE!"

hahahaha DUDE!

You should hear him go at it toe-to-toe with Geraldo! EPIC!

He only hollers at folks when his bullshit alarm goes off.

We should ALL have one! :lol:
Don't start none...won't be none.
User avatar
Walkinghairball
Posts: 25037
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:42 pm
Location: In a rock an roll venue near you....as long as you are in the Pacific Northwest.

Post by Walkinghairball »

It does bug me that Palin spends way too much $$$ on stuff..............is it her money, or ours?????


It does bug me that Palin gaffed huge on Africa.



It also bugged me when O said there was 57 states. But everyone makes mistakes. Granted, her's are colossal.
This space for rent
CygnusX1
Posts: 17306
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: We don't call 911 here.

Post by CygnusX1 »

Walkinghairball wrote: It does bug me that Palin spends way too much $$$ on stuff..............is it her money, or ours?????
***Supposedly, the clothes were funded by the party, but returned to
them and they will be auctioned for charity.***

Walkinghairball wrote:It does bug me that Palin gaffed huge on Africa.
***DID SHE? Show me where it's been proven and I'll shut up about it.
From what I've seen, it's a "mystery" whether it's even true or not
because the source will not identify themselves to back it up. However, I
could not have any idea of what I'm talking about.*** :lol:
Walkinghairball wrote:It also bugged me when O said there was 57 states. But everyone makes mistakes. Granted, her's are colossal.
***She does seem ditzy, but still....At least she knows there are four
letters in the word "jobs," and doesn't claim to go to a restaurant
that's been closed for twenty years....unlike Joe Biden.

Biden's the consummate politician though. I wish him well.***
Don't start none...won't be none.
User avatar
Walkinghairball
Posts: 25037
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:42 pm
Location: In a rock an roll venue near you....as long as you are in the Pacific Northwest.

Post by Walkinghairball »

Walkinghairball wrote:
It does bug me that Palin gaffed huge on Africa.


***DID SHE? Show me where it's been proven and I'll shut up about it.
From what I've seen, it's a "mystery" whether it's even true or not
because the source will not identify themselves to back it up. However, I
could not have any idea of what I'm talking about.***
Well, that is what I get for watching a you tube vid of a FOCKS News report.
Walkinghairball wrote:
It does bug me that Palin spends way too much $$$ on stuff..............is it her money, or ours?????


***Supposedly, the clothes were funded by the party, but returned to
them and they will be auctioned for charity.***
Supposedly better be the operative work, or she is a crook bro.

Walkinghairball wrote:
It also bugged me when O said there was 57 states. But everyone makes mistakes. Granted, her's are colossal.


***She does seem ditzy, but still....At least she knows there are four
letters in the word "jobs," and doesn't claim to go to a restaurant
that's been closed for twenty years....unlike Joe Biden.

Biden's the consummate politician though. I wish him well.***
And as I said, everyone makes mistakes.
This space for rent
CygnusX1
Posts: 17306
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: We don't call 911 here.

Post by CygnusX1 »

Walkinghairball wrote:Well, that is what I get for watching a you tube vid of a FOCKS News report.
One talking head SAYING she did on Fox, youTube, w/e ...doesn't mean
that it happened. Reporter-dude wasn't there....Bring the source on
national TV and let's prove this did or didn't happen. At least show
a videotape or audio or something....

Can you say witch hunt?


mmmm...donuts.... ***chomp***
Don't start none...won't be none.
User avatar
ElfDude
Posts: 11085
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 1:19 pm
Location: In the shadows of the everlasting hills
Contact:

Post by ElfDude »

CygnusX1 wrote:
Walkinghairball wrote: It does bug me that Palin spends way too much $$$ on stuff..............is it her money, or ours?????
***Supposedly, the clothes were funded by the party, but returned to
them and they will be auctioned for charity.***
Why, in the midst of this conversation, does no one mention all of Obama's $1500 suits? How many did he get? Or those awful custom-made pant-suits Hillary wore. Those had a supposed retail value of $6500 each. How many did she go through? Palin's wardrobe budget was the norm for this kind of thing. But the press had to gin up a bunch of mock righteous indignation about it. And so many suckers parroted them.
Aren't you the guy who hit me in the eye?
Image
Post Reply